Are YOU Paying for Infant Circumcision?

By Danelle Day © 2010

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, routine infant circumcision (RIC) surgery alone costs taxpayers close to $70 million annually. Costs are much greater when payments for post-op complications and extended hospital stays are included in the circumcision surgery figures. (1)

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (federal program) has defined elective circumcision (ICD-9-CM V50.2) as medically unnecessary - the amputation of the prepuce organ is therefore a cosmetic, irreversible, surgical body modification. And it is one that is being done to infant boys with your tax dollars in 33 U.S. states and among TRICARE covered military families.

A study (2009) published in the American Journal of Public Health demonstrates that infant circumcision declines in those areas where Medicaid no longer covers the surgery (graph below). (2) As a result, many human rights activists believe that the key to granting all boys and men their right to bodily integrity lies in a nation wide end to Medicaid funding of RIC.

Members of GI: Genital Integrity for Military Families Abroad are equally concerned with ending TRICARE's coverage of RIC for babies born to military personnel both in the States and abroad. In the Netherlands, where several GI volunteers work, the national medical society, KNMG, takes a firm stance against infant circumcision:
The official viewpoint of KNMG and other related medical/scientific organisations is that non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a violation of children’s rights to autonomy and physical integrity. Contrary to popular belief, circumcision can cause complicationsbleeding, infection, urethral stricture and panic attacks are particularly common. KNMG is therefore urging a strong policy of deterrence. KNMG is calling upon doctors to actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications.
The International Coalition for Genital Integrity and Colorado's National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers offer the following reasons to stop Medicaid funding of RIC:

* Infant circumcision is not recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (3) or any national medical organization in the world.
* Circumcision is considered medically unnecessary by all major medical organizations.
* Circumcision does not contribute to health, and deters from health.
* Nearly 70% of American parents do not want their boys (or their girls) circumcised.
* Routine circumcision of newborns has been abandoned in all English-speaking countries. (It has never been customary in most of the world.)
* According to comprehensive analysis, infant circumcision is not cost-effective. (4)
* Those choosing circumcision for themselves may pay privately if they desire as consenting adults.
* Medicaid savings will average $1 million annually for each State.
* Medically necessary programs need this money.

Currently, Medicaid does not cover infant circumcision in the following 18 states. Each state is listed according to the year in which tax payer funding of RIC ended in the state.

California - 1982

North Dakota - 1986

Oregon - 1994

Mississippi - 1998

Nevada - 1998

Washington - 1998

Missouri - 2002

Arizona - 2002

North Carolina - 2002

Montana - 2003

Utah - 2003

Florida - 2003

Maine - 2004

Louisiana - 2005

Idaho - 2005

Minnesota - 2005

South Carolina - 2011

Colorado - 2011

For further information and to become involved see:

Medicaid and Circumcision File (pdf)

Circumstitions: There's Money in Circumcision

ICGI: Medicaid Project

End Medicaid Funding of Infant Circumcision Facebook Page

End Taxpayer Funding of Routine Infant Circumcision Facebook Group

Find Your State's Medicaid Funding RIC Facebook page here 

Medicaid Sample Letters to send (from

(TRICARE) GI: Genital Integrity for Military Families Abroad


1. Mansfield CJ, Hueston WJ, Rudy M. Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay. Journal of Family Practice, 1995;41(4):370-376.

2. Arleen A. Leibowitz, Katherine Desmond, Thomas Belin Determinants and Policy Implications of Male Circumcision in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 2009;99(1):1–7.

3. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 1999;102(3):686-693.

4. Van Howe RS. A cost-utility analysis of neonatal circumcision. Medical Decision Making. 2004;24:584- 601.



  1. Woo hoo for North Carolina MedicaId NOT covering circumcision! Unfortunately we are surrounded by a sea of white. Now let's figure out how to change the policy in other states.

    1. I am going to tie down to a board all female doctors that circumcise baby boys and cut off their clitorisis to see how they like it.

  2. Thank you! Ending Medicaid coverage has been a long difficult project. Now that we have so many new voices, the government must listen and STOP funding unnecessary surgery! Please get involved!

  3. I noticed that Missouri is shown in green, and it's true that the state no longer pays for RIC through so-called "straight" medicaid. However, the medicaid programs that cover pregnant women and kids have been privatized and 2/3 of those programs DO cover RIC. They're called MC+, but it's still taxpayer money being used to fund MGM. I wonder if this is the case in any of the other green states...?

  4. I wish I wasn't paying for it through my private insurance, either, but maybe if my state ceased Medicaid funding, private insurers would follow.

  5. Something cool I notice... it doesn't seem to matter whether the state is typically red or blue, both colors have stopped funding for the unnecessary cutting of baby boys. That makes me happy to see that partisan politics haven't gotten in the way of ending the abuse of little boys. Now we just need to get everyone else on board.

  6. BIG PROPS TO SC! Happy to announce that South Carolina stopped funding circumcision surgery on infants this month! Let's get involved and encourage Medicaid to stop funding in the other 33 states!

  7. San Francisco MGMBillFebruary 21, 2011 9:32 PM

    The cost of circumcision only starts with the procedure. A cadre of pediatricians and pediatric urologists make their living correcting problems caused by "routine" circumcisions. Most ob/gyns never bother with any follow up and certainly never ask the patient when he is old enough if he is happy with their work. It's just about money.

  8. We can't get medicaid in TX to cover LMs for low income families, but they sure will sponsor them in cutting parts of their son's penis off SMH

  9. SC Medicaid quit covering it in February of this year! Woohoo! I wish we could see stats on circumcision in 2010 and then 2011 to see if it drops because of it.

  10. Nevada Medicaid stopped paying for circumcisions some time ago. It's actually the reason my son wasn't circ'ed..I couldn't afford the procedure out of pocket, and Medicaid didn't cover it, so I was forced to leave him intact (at the time I was uneducated on the penis subject and thought circumcision was necessary and better and all that). It was absolutely the greatest thing that Medicaid could've done for my son, and I am so happy that I was too poor to pay for the procedure.

    There are very few positive things about where I live, but this is definitely something to be proud of!

  11. Proud to say that here in South Carolina we are NOT paying for it. And, trust me here, I'm not too proud of much that South Carolina does...

  12. I'm so glad Canada as a whole no longer covers it! :D

  13. we shouldn't get too distracted with 'pride' in individual states, or countries. there is still a lot of educating to do. stopping government funding is a long way short of a ban, which is the best way to protect the maximum number of children from knife happy crazies.

  14. this just pisses me off!!



Related Posts with Thumbnails