Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Doctors Who Circumcise: Breaking the Law in Britain

Via Men's Health Forum


Supporters of genital autonomy have argued that the practice of male genital cutting (circumcision) could be illegal on minors under the Offences Against the Person Act and have critiqued the British Medical Association's position on the circumcision surgery as 'unethical.'

Earlier this month, Men Do Complain (MDC) and NORM-UK chairman, Dr. John Warren, and colleagues (pictured above) delivered an open letter to the BMA arguing that, "A child who has no disease, no injury or no dangerous abnormality has no need of any type of treatment or irreversible surgery" and that to carry it out just to please the parents "violates the autonomy of children."

The letter goes on to say that "Any surgery that is performed without the patient’s personal consent and without therapeutic need is clearly an assault. Any cut made without consent or therapeutic need 'that breaks the continuity of the skin' is a wounding under the (Offences Against the Person) Act 1861."

All other genital touching is vigorously prosecuted under British law.

Richard Dunker of MDC said, "The current attitude of the medical authorities toward circumcision is inappropriate in an era where children’s individual rights are increasingly recognised. Adults have a duty of care and responsibility to nurture their children, but this does not extend to a power to authorise non-therapeutic removal of a body part, however trivial an individual doctor may consider it to be."

Dunker continues, "It is hard to see how protecting children from unnecessary genital surgery is not in the public interest when prosecutions for touching the genitals of children are vigorously pursued. In a non-therapeutic circumcision such touching is done with impunity."



The rate of genital cutting in Britain is significantly lower than in the United States (where the CDC reported 32% of baby boys born in 2009 were circumcised).

Additional information on the prepuce (foreskin), intact care, and circumcision at: Are You Fully Informed? 

~~~~

4 comments:

  1. Very interesting...good to know there are people standing up against the mutilation of baby boys' genitals...my son will grow up to be thrilled he still has his foreskin intact, whether or not he looks like his classmates (which is an argument often used by parents who choose to circumcise...)Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Without citing any circumfetish or pro-MGM websites from Morris & Co., could anyone tell me what the current circumcision rate is in Britain? Friends living there tell me it is very, very low - they know no one who cuts other than some families who do so at home "for religious reasons." But I am wondering if there is any documented statistics on this?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I currently live in England and don't know of anyone of non-Jewish decent who performs circumcision. I don't know the percentage, though. NetDoctor.co.UK says that 6% of UK born boys were circed in 1975 compared to 20% in the 40s...but gives no newer data.
    http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealth/facts/circumcision.htm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michael,

    You can get accurate information via NORM-UK or from Dr Anthony Lempert from the Secular Medical Forum. Google them and the organisations come up. They are both at the forefront of trying to end non therapeutic genital cutting of boys in this country.
    Unfortunately, circumcision is now available on the NHS in various clinics around the country for people who want circumcisions for religious reasons, presumably because the cost to the NHS from complications carried out by non - medically qualified cutters is much higher in comparison. The complcation rate is significant when not done under the NHS. I suspect therefore that it is mainly those of the Muslism faith, but I could be wrong. HTH.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails