Medical Organization Position Statements on Circumcision

No national medical organization recommends the routine genital cutting of infants without medically justified need for such surgery to take place. Infant circumcision is clearly spoken against in many nations, regardless of babies' sex (female, male, intersex) and is not supported for all babies in any nation, even those that otherwise stem from within a cutting culture.

What follows are current medical position statements from organizations across the globe today. Full statements are readily available via online searches. When we recognize that no national medical organization recommends routine infant circumcision, it becomes clear that such things should not be funded with tax payer dollars (Medicaid and similar programs), covered by health insurance (genital cutting of infants is not performed as a health treatment), or pushed upon unknowing parents by any medical staff who stands to financially gain from performing unnecessary genital surgery upon a non-consenting human being.

You are welcome to download and print the above card,
or they arrive with most items via Etsy as large, glossy placards.

Related Reading: 

Peer reviewed published research on circumcision and the functions of the foreskin:

Scholarly books:

On the ethics of registered nurses assisting in forced infant circumcision:

The Medical Benefits of Infant Circumcision:

Intact Care & Circumcision Physician Packs (by/for those practicing in medical fields today):

Expecting Packs (for friends and family, can be mailed anonymously or with a personalized note):

to join our advisory panel of physicians, email

No comments:

Post a Comment


Related Posts with Thumbnails