Don't Retract Pack
- CONTACT / ABOUT
- INFO CARDS / WRISTBANDS
- INFO PACK
- LIBRARY RESOURCE LISTS
- LOCAL CHAPTERS
- GUEST AUTHOR
- Foreskin Friendly Physicians
- Don't Retract Pack
- Intact Care
- Judaism & Brit Milah
- Christianity & Circumcision
- Islam & Circumcision
- MGM Memorial
- Supporting Members
- Discussion Groups
- EXPOS & EVENTS
- SOS: Sponsor a Son
Stealing Foreskins: The Science of Skin Grafting
If you think that the prepuce organ ('foreskin') forcibly amputated from newborn baby boys during circumcision surgeries in the United States (and to a much lesser degree, those in Canada) is being tossed into the trash - you may want to think twice.
One of the factors driving the continuation of prepuce amputation of approximately 32% of boys born in the U.S. (9% born in Canada) is that these very valuable organs encompass a great deal of healing factors (both for the boy they belong to AND for those who use the prepuce when it is stolen from him). Foreskins are a valuable commodity, worth a great deal as they are more useful than almost any other body organ. They are commonly sold by hospitals for research, medical, and cosmetic use.
It is shocking that Dr. James McGuire brags to CNN about just how valuable a newborn baby foreskin is to skin graft patients...without ever addressing the violence behind where it came from.
For more on this subject, also see: The Foreskins in Oprah's Facecream
By Val Willingham
CNN Medical Producer
Adell Tomas, who lives outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, admits she has a weight problem: Ten years ago, she tipped the scales at more than 300 pounds. Because of her obesity, she developed high blood pressure, arthritis and type 2 diabetes. She says she just didn't take care of herself.
And then one day, she noticed a huge sore on the bottom of her foot. Like many diabetics, she has little feeling in her feet, so she had no idea what had caused the sore or even how long it had been there.
"It was huge and looked terribly infected," she recalled. "Dark red, almost black."
A few weeks later, Tomas' foot was amputated; the wound was so large, her doctors couldn't repair it.
"Doctors said at that time there was nothing they could do," the 51-year-old said.
That was then.
Now, doctors who specialize in wound management are growing skin to help people like Tomas save their limbs and extremities. Pharmaceutical and biotech companies are extracting collagen -- a protein that makes up 75 percent of skin -- from donated skin and creating grafts, or patches, that can induce a patient's own skin to grow. The donated skin can come from a variety of sources: anything from a pig's pancreas to a newborn baby's foreskin.
"In some cases, we can get four football fields of skin out of one baby foreskin," said Dr. James McGuire, head of wound management at the Foot and Ankle Institute at the School of Podiatric Medicine at Temple University, in Philadelphia. "If taken care of, skin can grow and grow."
In most cases, a scrape or cut mends itself or can be helped along with a Band-Aid and some antibiotic cream. These injuries heal because our skin is designed to repair itself. Yet in the case of large or deep wounds, like Tomas', the skin doesn't heal because it has become so infected, it turns gangrenous and can't grow new cells.
The idea behind these collagen grafts is to create a sort of scaffolding into the wound, upon which a patient's cells can attach and grow.
"Once you take all the cells out of there and strip it down to the collagen level, the body says, 'This is great; this is what we make our bodies out of,' " McGuire said. "And tissues will grow around it."
Although these collagen patches can be used to treat the wounds of soldiers and burn patients, they are more commonly prescribed for people who suffer from peripheral artery disease, pressure ulcers and diabetes.
"The patient can't feel anything, so when they step on a tack or get a blister or a penetrating wound to the skin, it just gets infected and keeps festering. And a lot of elderly [people] who are bedridden in nursing homes develop these horrible bed sores," McGuire said. "These patches can help them."
The patches come from different sources and can contain additional ingredients.
Some patches are created from animal organs, such as cow intestines, and even from the skin of some reptiles. A New Zealand company has developed a patch that contains honey, which is a natural antiseptic. Other patches contain elements such as silver, which has been shown in studies to be an excellent antibacterial agent.
Whether a patient needs a patch from a bovine or a boa is determined by the injury. Depending on its origin, a graft can differ in size, thickness and how fast it generates tissue.
"Although all of these patches can help mend wounds, it really depends on the wound itself as to which patch you should use," McGuire said. "How much is it infected, how long it's been infected, what the infection is, that sort of thing."
For Tomas, it's too late. She is managing the loss of her foot and has dropped almost 70 pounds since she first noticed the wound.
"It's great they can do all these things with fixing injuries," she said. "But had I been watching out for my health and looking at my feet every day, I would have caught that injury before it got nasty."
She shakes her head: "It was really something I could have avoided."
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I really hope this story doesn't persuade the person "on the fence" to reduce their son's penis. Would such a mind be thinking, "Lets give away apart of our son's body to someone who needs it." Do they even care? Not trying to be cavalier. Just constructive. I do not know what must be going through their minds when handing over their son so someone else can steal apart of their child's body part. It really does belong to the newborn. And, I thought selling organs illegal... yes/no?ReplyDelete
Selling organs IS illegal.ReplyDelete
Except for the male prepuce.
It is also a felony to cut the prepuce of a minor, but only if the minor is a girl.
And parental proxy consent is not considered valid for any non-therapeutic surgery on a child.
Except when the parent wants to amputate the most sensitive tissue on their male child's body.
Does this strike anyone else as arbitrary, unnecessary, sick and sexist in the extreme?
This makes me sick ... just sick. One foreskin can yield enough skin for one football field? From a non-consenting donor. No wonder medical people are so persistent in trying to get them.ReplyDelete
The loss of the foreskin is one horrible aspect but living with the experience of circumcision ... is unimaginable to me. Part four of my film, The Other Side of the Glass, a birth film for fathers, will be about healing the masculine. It will address the impact of violation after violation of the human baby during the modern birth process and then the circumcision for the males.
www.hospitalbirthdebate.blogspot.com is my old blog, but I just posted my letter in support of Intact America.
www.thoughtcrimeradio.blogspot.com is the blog for a radio show I do live on Mondays at 5 pm Central on www.kopn.org. We've spent months talking about circumcision and you can listen to the podcasts. Linked on the blog.
We consider ourselves a "civilized" society while selling the body parts forcibly taken from our newborns? I wonder how we will be looked upon and judged by future generations for committing this horrific act? Can you imagine?ReplyDelete
and the first settlers of the U.S. called the Natives savage.. now we are the most developed nation in the world and look what we have become. savages.ReplyDelete
I just learned that our friend with diabetes requires a reconstruction of her foot. Her surgeon revealed that the replacement skin will be crafted from infant foreskins, even though she was willing to use her own skin. No wonder hospitals continue to offer this procedure. It clearly boosts their profit margins and leaves the voiceless donors uncompensated. This is a calling to parents to be that voice. As I hold my son now, I thank God we were educated.ReplyDelete
I think the choice of the word "donated" ought to be reconsidered. Michael Steane.ReplyDelete
All these responses are healthy. This is body-part theft from defenceless infant boys. And for a chain of profit. Macabre and enraging in equal measure. And yes, in future Americans will look back at previous generations and think: 'they were monstrous'. It will take generations to heal the wounds from this grotesque cultural ritual still practiced today.ReplyDelete
I've emigrated to Europe and have not looked back. I am an intactivist but from a distance. I couldn't continue to live in a society where raping and mutilating helpless infants is normalised.