Sunday, September 27, 2009

HIV Increases in Africa Where Most Men Circumcised

This is not a big shocking surprise to anyone who knows about the immunological and protective functions and purposes of the prepuce (foreskin) or the hard, cold facts that when you circumcise men, you increase rates of all STDs (including HIV). Countries where 99% of men are intact have the lowest rates of HIV. The United States, with the highest number of circumcised adult men, has the highest rate of HIV among developed nations. Condoms prevent the spread of HIV, not circumcision. This is not a difficult equation to figure out. But apparently we must wait for the 'experts' amputating foreskins in Africa to tell us this.

Although circumcision has been touted as one of the ways to prevent HIV infection, recent findings show an increase in HIV infection in regions where most males are circumcised.

Recent findings show an increase in HIV infection in regions where most males are circumcised.

By Arthur Okwemba

As thousands of young men in Nyanza Province troop to health centres to be circumcised in hopes of fending off HIV, new studies show it might be too early to claim victory. Although circumcision has been touted as one of the ways to prevent HIV infection, recent findings show an increase in HIV infection in regions where most males are circumcised.

According to findings of the Kenya Aids Indicator Survey (Kais) released last week, North Eastern and Coast provinces, where 97 per cent of males were circumcised, registered an increase in HIV prevalence.

Within a span of five years, HIV prevalence in North Eastern and Coast provinces increased from 0 to 1.0 per cent and from 5.8 per cent to 8.3 per cent respectively. In the same period, HIV prevalence in Nyanza Province, where about 60% of men are intact, stood at 15 per cent, the lowest in the country.

These are sobering statistics for young men who have rushed to get circumcised in he belief that doing so would provide complete protection from HIV infection. The new findings of growing HIV prevalence among circumcised males indicates the practice cannot protect an individual from HIV infection unless it is combined with other practices including using condoms, being faithful to one partner, or abstaining from sex.

Health officials acknowledge that getting people to look at circumcision in the larger context of other factors and strategies can be challenging. “The figures from these two provinces are sending a warning that circumcision alone is not the magic bullet to controlling the disease. Other methods have to be used in combination,” said Dr Ibrahim Mohammed, Head of National Aids and STD Control Programmes in the Ministry of Medical Services.

The increase in prevalence in communities that circumcise indicates there are other factors that contribute to the spread of the disease among males. Multiple sexual partners, low condom use and alcohol and drug abuse are some of the factors.

“Unless we address all the reasons predisposing people to HIV infection, we might not make much headway,” said Judy Adero, who has lived with the virus for nine years. But scientists still believe circumcision will result in the lowering of HIV prevalence in provinces such as Nyanza.

Dr David DeCock, director of the Kenya office of the US Centers for Disease Control, said he has no doubt that circumcision prevents HIV infection. His study shows that the rate of HIV prevalence among circumcised men was 3.9 per cent compared to 13.2 per cent among the intact men. Buoyed by these differences, the government and other organisations have opened 200 circumcision centres.

More than 30,000 men have been circumcised since the call first went out; the target of 100,000 circumcised men is expected to be reached by year’s end (2009).

Meanwhile, female activists have criticised the way the whole operation is being carried out, arguing that it is making women more vulnerable as men engage in sex with multiple partners secure in the [false] knowledge that they are 'safe.'

The decision to adopt circumcision as one method in the HIV prevention strategy has been informed by research findings of three trials done in South Africa, Uganda and Kenya which showed circumcision to reduce the risk of HIV infection in 2006.

This was followed by World Health Organisation and UNAids issuing recommendations for increased male circumcision rates in countries where the HIV prevalence is high.

Of the 1,546 men who were circumcised, 20 became infected with HIV while 49 of the 1,582 intact men became infected.

The findings made the South African scientists undertake large-scale male circumcision as a possible strategy for preventing two million HIV infections and 300,000 deaths in their country over the next 10 years. In December 2006, the Data Safety Monitoring Board that was overseeing the Kenyan and Ugandan male circumcision trials announced the operation was a safe and effective.

FOR MORE ON HIV/AIDS AND CIRCUMCISION:

**See This Public Health Policy Site

**The Nuts & Bolts of HIV in the USA and Why Circumcision Won't Protect Men

** The Truth About Circumcision and HIV

**Here We Go Again: HIV & Circumcision

** For a "lighter" look: Penn & Teller Discuss the Latest

7 comments:

  1. This article ends in overpowering the message in its headline. Circumcision is being shown NOT work, but despite this blatant evidence, it must continue because of the studies that say it does.

    ???

    ReplyDelete
  2. “The figures from these two provinces are sending a warning that circumcision alone is not the magic bullet to controlling the disease. Other methods have to be used in combination,” said Dr Ibrahim Mohammed, Head of National Aids and STD Control Programmes in the Ministry of Medical Services.

    It's funny to observe what words they use to make you think there would be a benefit from it after all. Instead of saying "circumcision is not a magic bullet" he said "circumcision ALONE is not a magic bullet" They are still denying the truth even though things are backfiring on them already.

    You are totally right Joe. The end of the article overpowers the message that circumcision increases HIV. Their claims which now prove not to be true are being repeated as if they were true.

    Bring all genital torturers and mutilators to justice now! We all have had enough of their lies and their cruelties.

    ReplyDelete
  3. well doesn't that just put the theory that to circ will reduce HIV, nice one.

    ReplyDelete
  4. can't believe anyone bought it to begin with!

    ReplyDelete
  5. humans (in general) are dumb. i mean, who'd have thought The Today Show, Bloggerheads, and the NY Times could possibly NOT be the best, most accurate sources of information with which to make our decisions?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course, this is nothing new. Results from this study, linked below, were presented at the same Toronto AIDS conference where the results from the supposedly pro-circ studies were presented. Counter evidence showed places where circumcision either showed no benefits, or actually seemed to be associated with an increase in HIV. For some reason, these results have been ignored.
    Perhaps it's because the pro-circ studies have the support of those like Bill Gates and Bill Clinton.
    http://www.docguide.com/news/content.nsf/news/852571020057CCF6852571CD005207D9

    ReplyDelete
  7. Circumcision increases friction so more AIDS if circumcised!

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails